 |
 |
 |
Notes and Sources
Main info from http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Facts.asp
1) This figure is based on purchasing power parity (PPP), which basically suggests that prices of goods in countries tend to equate under floating exchange rates and therefore people
would be able to purchase the same quantity of goods in any country for a given sum of money. That is, the notion that a dollar
should buy the same amount in all countries. Hence if a poor person in a poor country living on a dollar a day moved to the
U.S. with no changes to their income, they would still be living on a dollar a day. In addition, see the following:
- Ignacio Ramonet, The politics of hunger, Le Monde diplomatique, November 1998
- The 9th International Anti-Corruption Conference Plenary Address by James Wolfensohn, August 2000
- March recognizes the billions living on less than two dollars a day, EarthTimes.org, October 24, 2000
- The poverty lines: population living with less than 2 dollars and less than 1 dollar a day from PovertyMap.net provides two maps showing the concentration of people living on less than 1 and 2 dollars per day, around
the world.
- Also note that these numbers, from the World Bank, have been questioned and criticized.
- The World Bank has been criticized for almost arbitrarily coming up with a definition of a poverty line to mean one dollar per
day (of which they say there are about 1.3 billion people). That figure and how it has been chosen has been much criticized by
many, as shown by University of Ottawa Professor, Michel Chossudovsky in the previous link.
- In addition, in the United States for example, the poverty threshold for a family of four has been estimated to be around
eleven dollars per day. The one dollar a day definition then misses out much of humanity to understand the impacts. Even the
two dollars per day that I have pointed out here, while affecting half of humanity, also misses out the numbers under three
or four, or eleven dollars per day. These statistics are harder to find, and as I come across them, I will post them here!
- More fundamental than that though, for example, is a critique from Columbia University, called How not to count the poor. The report describes an ill-defined poverty line, a misleading and inaccurate measure of purchasing power equivalence, and
false precision as the three main errors that may lead to “a large understatement of the extent of
global income poverty and to an incorrect inference that it has declined.” (Emphasis added). This allows the World Bank
to insist that the world is indeed “on the right track” in terms of poverty reduction strategy, attributing this
“success” to the design and implementation of “good” or “better policies”.
- But the statistic is not lost on some of the most prominent people in the world
- The New York Times in one of their email updates, in their Quote of the Day section, for July 18, 2001 provided
the following quote: “A world where some live in comfort and plenty, while half of the human race lives on less than
$2 a day, is neither just, nor stable.” -- President Bush
- See also James Wolfenson, The Other Crisis, World Bank, October 1998 who said: “Today, across the world,
1.3 billion people live on less than one dollar a day; 3 billion live on under two dollars a day; 1.3 billion have no access
to clean water; 3 billion have no access to sanitation; 2 billion have no access to electricity.” (See also note 21 below.)
- Koffi Anan, UN Secretary General, in a speech on the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, 17 October 2000, said “Almost half the world's population
lives on less than two dollars a day, yet even this statistic fails to capture the humiliation, powerlessness and brutal hardship
that is the daily lot of the world's poor.”
2) Ignacio Ramonet, The politics of hunger, Le Monde Diplomatique, November 1998
3) The State of the World's Children, 1999, UNICEF
4) State of the World, Issue 287 - Feb 1997, New Internationalist
5) Holding Transnationals Accountable, IPS, August 11, 1998
6) The Corporate Planet, Corporate Watch, 1997
7) Debt - The facts, Issue 312 - May 1999, New Internationalist
8) 1998 Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme
9) 1999 Human Development Report, United Nations Development Programme
10) Ibid
11) Ibid
12) Missing the Target; The price of empty promises, Oxfam, June 2000
13) Global Development Finance, World Bank, 1999
14) Economics forever; Building sustainability into economic policyPANOS Briefing 38, March 2000
15) Human Development Report 2000, p. 82, United Nations Development Programme
16) Ibid, p. 82
17) Ibid, p. 73
18) World Resources Institute Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems, February 2001, (in the Food Feed and Fiber section). Note, that dispite the food production rate being better than population growth rate, there is still so much hunger around
the world.
19) The home page of the Jubilee 2000 web site, as of March 24, 2001
20) The Scorecard on Globalization 1980-2000: Twenty Years of Diminished Progress, by Mark Weisbrot, Dean Baker, Egor Kraev and Judy Chen, Center for Economic Policy and Research, August 2001.
21) James Wolfenson, The Other Crisis, World Bank, October 1998, quoted from The Reality of Aid 2000,
(Earthscan Publications, 2000), p.10
22) Larry Elliott, A cure worse than the disease, The Guardian, January 21, 2002
23) John Cavanagh and Sarah Anderson , World's Billionaires Take a Hit, But Still Soar, The Institute for Policy Studies, March 6, 2002
24) Maude Barlow, Water as Commodity - The Wrong Prescription, The Institute for Food and Development Policy, Backgrounder, Summer 2001, Vol. 7, No. 3
25) Consumerism, Volunteer Now! (undated)
26) State of the World's Children, 2005, UNICEF
Poverty Facts
|